Last Updated: June 01, 2026
Beginner
If you are new to the world of computer programming, choosing a programming language, to begin with, is probably the toughest hurdle. Currently, there are thousands of programming languages with different idiosyncrasies and complexities. On our site, we focus on Python, but there are other languages out there. Before you start your software development journey, choosing a programming language that suits your interests and career goals is important. That said, below are some of the best and in-demand coding languages you should consider.
Python developer and educator with 15+ years building production systems across data engineering, web APIs, and AI tooling. Founder of Python How To Program — 270+ in-depth tutorials covering the modern Python stack.
1. JavaScript
Modern software developers cannot succeed without mastering JavaScript. A 2020 survey done by Stack Overflow found that JavaScript is still the most popular programming language for developers for eight years in a row. More than 70% of study participants reported that they used this language for more than one year.
Together with CSS and HTML, JavaScript is an important coding language for front-end website development. Most websites, including Facebook, Gmail, YouTube, and Twitter, depend on JavaScript to display dynamic content to users for their interactive website pages.
Even though JavaScript is primarily a front-end web development language on browsers, it can be used on the server-side to develop scalable network applications with the help of Node.js. Node.js works with Windows, Linux, Mac OS, and SunOs.
JavaScript is a popular language amongst programming beginners because of its simple learning curve. It is used all through the web, thanks to its speed, and works well with other coding languages, enabling it to be used in various applications. That aside, the demand for JavaScript developers is currently high, with a CareerFoundry study concluding that 72% of businesses need JavaScript developers.
Pros of learning JavaScript
- Fast and can run immediately in browsers
- Provides an enriched and better web interface
- Highly versatile
- It can be used in various applications
- Has multiple add-ons
- Easily integrates with other programming languages.
Cons of learning JavaScript
- Lacks an equivalent or alternate method
- Different web browsers can interpret code lines differently.
2. Python
Python is a general-purpose coding language that is also very learner-friendly; there are even Python classes for children. However, despite being easy to learn, Python is an overly versatile and powerful language, making it suitable for beginners and experts. It is because of this that major companies, including Facebook and Google, use this language.
Python’s popularity is largely attributed to its extensive usage. It has applications in data science, scientific computing, data analytics, animation, database interfacing, web applications, machine learning, and data visualization. This versatility also explains the high demand for experts in this language.
Key features of Python include;
- It has a unique selling point – simple, productive, elegant, and powerful in one package.
- It influences other programming languages, such as Go and Julia
- Best for back-end web development with first-class integration with other programming languages, such as C++ and C.
- It offers many tools that can be applied in computational science, mathematics, statistics, and various libraries and frameworks, such as NumPy, Scikit-Learn, and Pandas.
Pros of learning Python
- Works in various platforms
- Improves developers and programmers productivity
- Has a wide array of support frameworks and libraries
- Powered by object-oriented programming
Cons of learning Python
- Not ideal for mobile computing
- It has a primitive and underdeveloped database

3. Java
Java is another popular coding language commonly used in-app and web development. Despite being an old coding language, Java is still in demand due to its complexity. Unfortunately, it isn’t beginner-friendly. It is a platform-independent language and a popular choice for various organizations, including Google and Airbnb, for its stability.
Key features of Java include;
- It is a multi-paradigm and feature-rich programming language
- Very productive for developers
- Moderate learning curve
- It doesn’t have major changes and updates like Python and Scala
- Has the best runtime
Pros of learning Java
- Has a wide array of open-source libraries
- Automated garbage collection
- Allows for platform independence
- Supports multithreading and distributed computing
- Has multiple APIs that support completion of various tasks, such as database connection, networking, and XML parsing
Cons of learning Java
- Expensive memory management
- Slow compared to other coding languages, such as C and C++
4. C#
C# is an object-oriented programming language developed by Microsoft. It was initially designed as part of the .NET framework for developing windows applications but is currently used in various applications. It is a general-purpose coding language used particularly in back-end development, game creation, mobile app development, and more. Despite being a Windows-specific language, it can also be used in Android, Linux, and iOS platforms.
The language has a legion of libraries and frameworks that have accrued for the last 20 years. Like Java, C# is independent of other platforms, thanks to its Common Language Runtime feature.
Pros of learning C#
- Can work with shared codebases
- Safe compared C++ and C
- Uses similar syntax with C++ and other C-derived languages
- Has rich data types and library
- Has a fast compilation and execution
Cons of learning C#
- Less flexible compared to C++
- You should have good knowledge to solve errors

5. PHP
PHP is another excellent programming language with many applications. While it faces stiff competition from other languages, such as Python and JavaScript, especially for web development, there is still a high demand for PHP professionals in the current job market. PHP is also a general-purpose and dynamic coding language that can be used to develop server-side applications.
Pros of learning PHP
- Easy to learn and use
- Has a wide ecosystem and community support
- Has many frameworks
- Supports object-oriented and functional paradigms
- Supports various automation tools
Cons of PHP
- Builds slow web pages
- Lacks error and security handling features
6. Angular
Angular is a recently updated and improved version of the initial AngularJS framework developed by Google. Compared to other recent coding languages, such as React, Angular has a steep learning curve but offers better practical solutions for front-end development. Developers can also program complicated and scalable applications using Angular, thanks to its great functionality, aesthetic visual designs, and business logic.
Key features of Angular include;
- Features a model-view control architecture that facilitates dynamic modeling
- Uses HTML coding language to develop user interfaces that are simple and easy to understand
- Uses old JavaScript objects, which are self-sufficient and very functional
- Has Angular filters, which filter data before being viewed
Pros of learning Angular
- Requires minimal coding experience to use
- Allows development of high-quality hybrid apps
- Has quick app prototyping
- Has enhanced testing ability
Cons of Angular
- Angular developed apps are dynamic, diminishing their performance
- Complicated pages in apps can cause glitches
- Difficult to learn

7. React
Also called ReactJS, React is a JavaScript framework developed by Facebook that enables programmers to develop user interfaces with dynamic abilities. Sites built using React respond faster, and developers can switch between multiple variable elements seamlessly. The language also enables businesses to build and maintain customer loyalty by providing a great user experience.
Pros of learning React
- Easy to learn and SEO friendly
- Reuses various components, thus saves time
- Has an open-source library
- Supported by a strong online community
- Has plenty of helpful development tools
Cons of React
- Additional SEO hurdle
- Has poor code documentation
The Bottom Line
As you choose your preferred web development language to learn, ensure that you aren’t guided by flashy inclinations and popularity contests. Even though the realm of computer programming keeps changing rapidly, the languages mentioned above can withstand these changes. Learning one or more of these languages will put you in a great position for many years to come. Make use of federal funding to pay for your online programming courses and Bootcamps. Veterans can learn web development languages at a discount using the GI Bill Benefits.
How To Get CPU Core Usage with psutil in Python
Intermediate
Your server is running slow, but top shows average CPU at 45% — nothing alarming. Then a colleague points out that core 3 has been pinned at 100% for the last hour while the other seven cores sit idle. A single-threaded bottleneck is strangling your app, invisible to anyone watching only the aggregate number. This is exactly the kind of problem you cannot catch without per-core monitoring, and Python makes it surprisingly easy to build.
The psutil library gives you cross-platform access to CPU usage per core, per-core clock frequency, per-core time breakdowns (user, system, idle), and memory statistics — all in a few lines of Python. It works identically on Windows, macOS, and Linux without requiring root access or system-specific tools like top, htop, or Task Manager. Install it once with pip and you are ready to go.
In this article we will cover everything you need to build a CPU monitoring tool with psutil. We start with a Quick Example so you get per-core numbers immediately. Then we dig into cpu_percent(), physical vs logical core counts, per-core frequency with cpu_freq(), time breakdowns with cpu_times(), memory monitoring, and threshold-based alerting. By the end you will have a real-time terminal dashboard you can point at any machine.
Getting Per-Core CPU Usage: Quick Example
Let us start with the most useful function in psutil for this task. The key is the percpu=True flag on cpu_percent() — without it you get one aggregate number; with it you get a list of percentages, one per logical core.
# quick_cpu_check.py
import psutil
import time
# Pass interval=1 to measure over a 1-second window (recommended)
# percpu=True returns a list -- one value per logical CPU core
core_usage = psutil.cpu_percent(interval=1, percpu=True)
print(f"Logical cores detected: {len(core_usage)}")
print()
for i, pct in enumerate(core_usage):
bar = "#" * int(pct / 5)
print(f" Core {i:>2}: {pct:5.1f}% [{bar:<20}]")
print()
print(f" Overall: {psutil.cpu_percent(interval=None):.1f}%")
Output:
Logical cores detected: 8
Core 0: 23.4% [#### ]
Core 1: 8.1% [# ]
Core 2: 91.3% [################## ]
Core 3: 6.2% [# ]
Core 4: 12.7% [## ]
Core 5: 9.4% [# ]
Core 6: 17.6% [### ]
Core 7: 5.0% [# ]
Overall: 21.7%
The output instantly reveals that core 2 is at 91% while the overall average looks benign at 21.7%. That discrepancy is exactly what aggregate monitoring misses. The interval=1 parameter tells psutil to collect a sample, wait one second, collect another, and return the difference -- this gives you a meaningful measurement rather than a snapshot that could be zero. The len(core_usage) check tells you how many logical cores the machine has, which varies from 2 on a budget laptop to 128 on a high-end server.
The rest of this article explains how each piece works, adds frequency and memory data, and builds toward a live refreshing terminal dashboard. Read on for the details, or jump straight to the Real-Life Example if you want the full script now.
What is psutil and Why Use It?
psutil (process and system utilities) is a cross-platform library for retrieving information on running processes and system utilization -- CPU, memory, disks, network, and sensors. It wraps the underlying OS interfaces (/proc on Linux, sysctl on macOS, Win32 API on Windows) so your Python code runs unchanged on all three platforms.
The alternative to psutil is platform-specific shell commands: mpstat -P ALL 1 on Linux, sysctl hw.perflevel0.physicalcpu on macOS, or WMI queries on Windows. You could parse their output with subprocess, but you would need separate code paths for each OS and your script would break every time the command output format changes. psutil solves all of that.
| Method | Platform | Root Required | Per-Core Data | Python API |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| psutil | Windows / macOS / Linux | No | Yes | Yes -- clean objects |
| mpstat | Linux only | No | Yes | Parse subprocess output |
| top / htop | Unix-like | No | Yes | No -- interactive only |
| WMI | Windows only | Admin for some | Partial | Via pywin32 |
| /proc/stat | Linux only | No | Yes | Manual file parsing |
Install psutil with pip -- it has no dependencies and compiles quickly:
# install_psutil.sh
pip install psutil
Once installed you can import it and immediately start querying system metrics. The sections below walk through each function you need for CPU monitoring.
Logical vs Physical Cores: What cpu_count() Returns
Before diving deeper into usage numbers, it helps to understand what "core" actually means here. Modern CPUs expose more logical cores than they have physical cores because of hyperthreading (Intel) or SMT (AMD). A 4-core chip with hyperthreading shows up as 8 logical cores. psutil lets you query both counts.
# core_count.py
import psutil
logical = psutil.cpu_count(logical=True) # includes hyperthreads
physical = psutil.cpu_count(logical=False) # physical cores only
print(f"Physical cores: {physical}")
print(f"Logical cores: {logical}")
print(f"Hyperthreading: {'Yes' if logical > physical else 'No'}")
print(f"HT ratio: {logical // physical}x" if physical else "")
Output:
Physical cores: 4
Logical cores: 8
Hyperthreading: Yes
HT ratio: 2x
The number of items in the list returned by cpu_percent(percpu=True) always matches cpu_count(logical=True) -- you get one entry per logical core. Physical core count matters for workloads that benefit from true parallelism (CPU-bound Python processes, for example) vs workloads that are mostly I/O-bound and can share a core fine. Knowing the physical count also helps you interpret the per-core usage: if logical cores 0 and 1 are both busy, that is likely one physical core under full load.
Per-Core Frequency with cpu_freq()
CPU frequency tells you whether a core is running at full speed or has been throttled by thermal limits. Modern processors use dynamic frequency scaling: they boost above the rated speed when the workload demands it (and the chip is cool enough), and throttle down to save power or prevent overheating.
# cpu_frequency.py
import psutil
# percpu=True returns a list of scpufreq namedtuples
freqs = psutil.cpu_freq(percpu=True)
if freqs:
print(f"{'Core':<8} {'Current MHz':>12} {'Min MHz':>10} {'Max MHz':>10}")
print("-" * 44)
for i, f in enumerate(freqs):
print(f"Core {i:<3} {f.current:>10.0f} {f.min:>9.0f} {f.max:>9.0f}")
else:
# Some Linux VMs do not expose per-core frequency
overall = psutil.cpu_freq()
print(f"Per-core freq not available. Overall: {overall.current:.0f} MHz")
Output:
Core Current MHz Min MHz Max MHz
--------------------------------------------
Core 0 3600 800 4200
Core 1 4100 800 4200
Core 2 4200 800 4200
Core 3 3200 800 4200
Core 4 3800 800 4200
Core 5 4000 800 4200
Core 6 4200 800 4200
Core 7 2900 800 4200
A core sitting at its maximum frequency (4200 MHz here) that also shows high CPU usage is healthy -- it is working hard and boosting as designed. A core showing high CPU usage but stuck at minimum frequency (800 MHz) is likely being throttled due to heat, and you have a cooling problem rather than a workload problem. The defensive check for if freqs: is important: some virtualized Linux environments do not expose per-core frequency and return an empty list.
Per-Core Time Breakdown with cpu_times()
CPU usage percentage tells you HOW MUCH a core is working, but not what it is doing. cpu_times() breaks the time a CPU has spent into categories: user space (your code), kernel space (system calls), idle, and on Linux you also get I/O wait and steal time (from hypervisor overhead in VMs).
# cpu_times_breakdown.py
import psutil
times = psutil.cpu_times(percpu=True)
print(f"{'Core':<6} {'User%':>7} {'Sys%':>7} {'Idle%':>7} {'IOWait%':>9}")
print("-" * 40)
for i, t in enumerate(times):
total = t.user + t.system + t.idle + getattr(t, 'iowait', 0.0)
if total == 0:
continue
user_pct = t.user / total * 100
sys_pct = t.system / total * 100
idle_pct = t.idle / total * 100
iowait_pct = getattr(t, 'iowait', 0.0) / total * 100
print(f"Core {i:<1} {user_pct:>7.1f} {sys_pct:>7.1f} {idle_pct:>7.1f} {iowait_pct:>9.1f}")
Output:
Core User% Sys% Idle% IOWait%
----------------------------------------
Core 0 18.2 4.1 77.7 0.0
Core 1 6.5 1.6 91.9 0.0
Core 2 88.4 2.9 8.7 0.0
Core 3 5.1 1.1 93.8 0.0
Core 4 11.3 0.8 87.9 0.1
Core 5 8.7 0.9 90.4 0.0
Core 6 15.2 1.4 83.4 0.0
Core 7 4.2 0.6 95.2 0.0
Note the getattr(t, 'iowait', 0.0) pattern. The iowait field only exists on Linux; using getattr with a default keeps the code portable to macOS and Windows. A core with high user% is running application code. High sys% means lots of system calls (file I/O, socket operations). High iowait% means the core is waiting on storage -- often a sign that your database or file access is the real bottleneck, not CPU.
Memory Monitoring: virtual_memory()
CPU monitoring is rarely useful in isolation -- memory pressure often causes CPU spikes as the OS spends cycles on swapping. Adding memory data to your monitor gives a more complete picture.
# memory_check.py
import psutil
mem = psutil.virtual_memory()
swap = psutil.swap_memory()
def fmt_bytes(n):
for unit in ('B', 'KB', 'MB', 'GB', 'TB'):
if n < 1024:
return f"{n:.1f} {unit}"
n /= 1024
return f"{n:.1f} PB"
print("RAM:")
print(f" Total: {fmt_bytes(mem.total)}")
print(f" Available: {fmt_bytes(mem.available)}")
print(f" Used: {fmt_bytes(mem.used)} ({mem.percent:.1f}%)")
print(f" Buffers: {fmt_bytes(getattr(mem, 'buffers', 0))}")
print(f" Cached: {fmt_bytes(getattr(mem, 'cached', 0))}")
print()
print("Swap:")
print(f" Total: {fmt_bytes(swap.total)}")
print(f" Used: {fmt_bytes(swap.used)} ({swap.percent:.1f}%)")
Output:
RAM:
Total: 15.9 GB
Available: 9.3 GB
Used: 6.1 GB (38.7%)
Buffers: 312.0 MB
Cached: 4.2 GB
Swap:
Total: 2.0 GB
Used: 0.0 MB (0.0%)
The mem.available field is the most actionable metric here -- it is not the same as mem.total - mem.used. Available includes memory that is currently used for caches but can be reclaimed immediately by applications. If mem.available drops near zero while swap.percent climbs, your machine is under genuine memory pressure and performance will degrade. The getattr calls on buffers and cached guard against Windows, which does not expose those fields.
Threshold Alerting: Raising Warnings When Cores Spike
Collecting metrics is only useful if something reacts to them. The next step is adding threshold checks so your monitoring code can trigger an alert, write to a log file, or send a notification when a core crosses a usage limit you define.
# cpu_alerts.py
import psutil
import time
import logging
logging.basicConfig(
level=logging.INFO,
format="%(asctime)s [%(levelname)s] %(message)s",
datefmt="%H:%M:%S",
)
CPU_WARN_PCT = 70.0 # warn if any single core exceeds this
CPU_CRIT_PCT = 90.0 # critical if any core exceeds this
MEM_WARN_PCT = 80.0 # warn if RAM usage exceeds this
CHECK_INTERVAL = 5 # seconds between checks
def check_once():
per_core = psutil.cpu_percent(interval=1, percpu=True)
mem = psutil.virtual_memory()
for i, pct in enumerate(per_core):
if pct >= CPU_CRIT_PCT:
logging.critical("Core %d at %.1f%% -- CRITICAL", i, pct)
elif pct >= CPU_WARN_PCT:
logging.warning("Core %d at %.1f%% -- high usage", i, pct)
if mem.percent >= MEM_WARN_PCT:
logging.warning("RAM at %.1f%% -- available: %.1f GB",
mem.percent, mem.available / 1e9)
if __name__ == "__main__":
logging.info("Starting CPU/memory monitor (Ctrl+C to stop)")
try:
while True:
check_once()
time.sleep(CHECK_INTERVAL)
except KeyboardInterrupt:
logging.info("Monitor stopped.")
Output:
09:14:01 [INFO] Starting CPU/memory monitor (Ctrl+C to stop)
09:14:02 [WARNING] Core 2 at 73.5% -- high usage
09:14:07 [CRITICAL] Core 2 at 94.1% -- CRITICAL
09:14:12 [CRITICAL] Core 2 at 98.7% -- CRITICAL
09:14:17 [INFO] Monitor stopped.
Using the standard logging module rather than print() means you can redirect this output to a file with one line change (filename="monitor.log" in the basicConfig call), or hook it into any structured logging pipeline. The CHECK_INTERVAL constant separated from cpu_percent(interval=1) is intentional -- the interval on cpu_percent controls measurement accuracy, while CHECK_INTERVAL controls how often you act on the results.
Real-Life Example: Live Terminal CPU Dashboard
Let us combine everything into a dashboard that refreshes in place every two seconds, showing per-core bars, frequency, and memory -- all in one compact terminal view.
# cpu_dashboard.py
import psutil
import time
import os
CPU_WARN = 70.0
CPU_CRIT = 90.0
REFRESH = 2.0 # seconds between refreshes
def color(pct):
"""Return ANSI color code based on usage percentage."""
if pct >= CPU_CRIT:
return "\033[91m" # bright red
if pct >= CPU_WARN:
return "\033[93m" # yellow
return "\033[92m" # green
RESET = "\033[0m"
def make_bar(pct, width=24):
filled = int(pct / 100 * width)
return "#" * filled + "-" * (width - filled)
def render():
os.system("cls" if os.name == "nt" else "clear")
print("=" * 56)
print(" psutil CPU Dashboard -- press Ctrl+C to exit")
print("=" * 56)
per_core = psutil.cpu_percent(interval=1, percpu=True)
freqs = psutil.cpu_freq(percpu=True) or []
mem = psutil.virtual_memory()
logical = psutil.cpu_count(logical=True)
physical = psutil.cpu_count(logical=False)
print(f" Cores: {physical} physical / {logical} logical\n")
for i, pct in enumerate(per_core):
freq_str = ""
if i < len(freqs):
freq_str = f" {freqs[i].current:>5.0f} MHz"
bar = make_bar(pct)
c = color(pct)
print(f" Core {i:>2}: {c}[{bar}]{RESET} {pct:5.1f}%{freq_str}")
avg = sum(per_core) / len(per_core) if per_core else 0
print(f"\n Avg: [{make_bar(avg)}] {avg:5.1f}%")
print()
mem_bar = make_bar(mem.percent, width=24)
mc = color(mem.percent)
avail_gb = mem.available / 1e9
print(f" RAM: {mc}[{mem_bar}]{RESET} {mem.percent:5.1f}% "
f"({avail_gb:.1f} GB free)")
swap = psutil.swap_memory()
if swap.total > 0:
swap_bar = make_bar(swap.percent, width=24)
sc = color(swap.percent)
print(f" Swap: {sc}[{swap_bar}]{RESET} {swap.percent:5.1f}%")
print()
print(f" Updated every {REFRESH}s -- {time.strftime('%H:%M:%S')}")
print("=" * 56)
if __name__ == "__main__":
try:
while True:
render()
time.sleep(REFRESH)
except KeyboardInterrupt:
print("\nDashboard stopped.")
Output (sample frame):
========================================================
psutil CPU Dashboard -- press Ctrl+C to exit
========================================================
Cores: 4 physical / 8 logical
Core 0: [######------------------] 25.4% 3600 MHz
Core 1: [#-----------------------] 8.1% 2900 MHz
Core 2: [######################--] 91.3% 4200 MHz
Core 3: [#-----------------------] 6.2% 3100 MHz
Core 4: [###---------------------] 12.7% 3400 MHz
Core 5: [##----------------------] 9.4% 3200 MHz
Core 6: [###---------------------] 17.6% 3800 MHz
Core 7: [#-----------------------] 5.0% 2800 MHz
Avg: [####--------------------] 22.0%
RAM: [############------------] 51.2% (7.8 GB free)
Swap: [------------------------] 0.0%
Updated every 2s -- 09:17:44
========================================================
The os.system("cls" if os.name == "nt" else "clear") call clears the terminal before each refresh, giving the appearance of an in-place update rather than scrolling output. The ANSI color codes turn critical cores red and high-usage cores yellow in any terminal that supports them (macOS Terminal, Linux terminals, Windows Terminal). To log to a file instead of the terminal, replace the render() call with the check_once() pattern from the alerting section. You can also extend this script by adding disk I/O stats with psutil.disk_io_counters(perdisk=True) or network throughput with psutil.net_io_counters(pernic=True).
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does cpu_percent() return 0.0 when I call it with no arguments?
The first call to psutil.cpu_percent() with no interval and no previous call in the same process always returns 0.0. psutil calculates CPU usage as the difference between two samples taken some time apart. The first call just sets the baseline; the second call (or a call with interval=N) returns the actual measurement. Always use interval=1 (or at least 0.1) for accurate readings, or call the function once at startup to prime it and then call it again after a small sleep.
When should I use logical=True vs logical=False in cpu_count()?
Use cpu_count(logical=True) when you want to know how many workers to create for I/O-bound tasks -- more logical cores means more threads can be useful. Use cpu_count(logical=False) for CPU-bound work where you spawn Python processes -- extra logical cores from hyperthreading rarely help CPU-bound code and can actually hurt throughput by competing for the same physical core resources. When in doubt, benchmark both: run your workload with physical workers and with logical workers and compare wall-clock time.
Does psutil need root/admin privileges?
No -- reading CPU usage percentages, frequencies, core counts, and memory stats does not require elevated permissions on Windows, macOS, or Linux. Some psutil functions DO require root, such as reading per-process memory maps or certain sensor temperatures (psutil.sensors_temperatures()). For a pure CPU and memory monitoring script like the one in this article, you can run as a regular user. If you get a psutil.AccessDenied exception, check which specific function triggered it -- it is almost certainly a process-level function, not a system-level one.
cpu_freq(percpu=True) returns an empty list on my Linux VM. What is wrong?
This is expected behavior on many virtualized Linux environments. The guest OS does not always have access to the host CPU's frequency scaling information. The psutil.cpu_freq() function reads from /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/ on Linux, which may not be populated by the hypervisor. Some cloud VMs (AWS, GCP, Azure) intentionally withhold this data. The safe approach is to always check if freqs: before iterating, and fall back to a single aggregate call (psutil.cpu_freq(percpu=False)) or simply skip the frequency column. The CPU usage percentage from cpu_percent() remains accurate even when frequency data is unavailable.
Does this code work on Windows without any changes?
Yes, with one small caveat: the ANSI color codes in the dashboard script require Windows 10 version 1607 or later with Windows Terminal or a VT100-compatible terminal. The standard Windows Command Prompt (cmd.exe) on older Windows versions does not render ANSI codes and will display them as literal characters like [91m. You can guard against this by wrapping the ANSI output in a try/except or by using the colorama library (pip install colorama), which translates ANSI codes to Win32 console calls. Everything else -- cpu_percent(), cpu_count(), cpu_freq(), virtual_memory(), and swap_memory() -- works identically on Windows.
Can I get CPU temperature with psutil?
On Linux and some macOS hardware, yes: psutil.sensors_temperatures() returns a dictionary of sensor readings grouped by device name. The key for CPU cores is usually 'coretemp' or 'k10temp' depending on the chip. Each entry has current, high, and critical temperature values in Celsius. This function is not available on Windows -- psutil simply does not expose it there because the Windows thermal sensor APIs require platform-specific third-party libraries. On unsupported platforms the call raises AttributeError, so always check hasattr(psutil, 'sensors_temperatures') before using it.
Conclusion
psutil makes per-core CPU monitoring a matter of two function calls. cpu_percent(interval=1, percpu=True) gives you a list of usage values -- one per logical core -- that reveals the imbalances a single aggregate number would hide. cpu_count(logical=True/False) tells you whether extra cores come from hyperthreading or are genuine physical cores. cpu_freq(percpu=True) shows whether cores are boosting or being throttled. cpu_times(percpu=True) breaks usage down into user, system, and iowait time so you know whether CPU cycles are spent on application code, kernel calls, or waiting on storage. And virtual_memory() and swap_memory() round out the picture by capturing memory pressure alongside CPU load.
Extend the dashboard by adding psutil.disk_io_counters(perdisk=True) for storage throughput, psutil.net_io_counters(pernic=True) for network stats, or hook the alert thresholds into a notification service like Slack or PagerDuty. You could also export metrics to a time-series database like Prometheus by wrapping the psutil calls in a Flask endpoint and adding a Prometheus client. The psutil documentation at psutil.readthedocs.io covers every available function in depth.
For deeper exploration, the Python Scalene profiler article shows how to go beyond monitoring into detailed line-level CPU and memory profiling within your own code, and the Python task automation guide covers scheduling monitoring scripts to run on a cron job.
Related Articles
Further Reading: For more details, see the official Python tutorial.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Python compare to JavaScript for web development?
Python excels in backend development with Django and Flask. JavaScript dominates the frontend and runs on the backend with Node.js. Python is preferred for data-heavy backends, while JavaScript enables full-stack development with a single language.
Is Python slower than other web languages?
Python is generally slower in raw execution speed compared to Go, Java, or Node.js. However, for most web apps the bottleneck is I/O, not CPU speed. Python’s developer productivity and rich ecosystem often outweigh the performance difference.
Can Python be used for frontend web development?
Python is primarily a backend language. Tools like Brython, Pyodide, and PyScript allow Python in the browser, but for production frontends JavaScript/TypeScript with React or Vue remains the standard.
What makes Python a good choice for web APIs?
Python offers mature API frameworks (Flask, FastAPI, Django REST Framework), excellent library support for data processing, simple syntax, and strong integration with databases, ML models, and third-party services.
Should I learn Python or JavaScript for web development?
Learn Python if you focus on data science, ML, or backend APIs. Learn JavaScript for full-stack web development. Many developers learn both. Python’s versatility across web, data, and automation makes it a strong choice.
Related Articles
- How To Use Python snoop for Function Tracing and Debugging
- How To Use Python responses for Mocking HTTP Requests in Tests
- How To Use Python freezegun for Mocking Time in Tests
- How To Use Python natsort for Natural Sort Order
- How To Use Python pendulum for Better Date and Time Handling
- How To Use Python structlog for Structured Logging
- How To Use Python PyGame for 2D Game Development
Continue Learning Python
Tutorials you might also find useful: